Moussaoui Al-Ajlawi, a research professor at the Center for Africa and the Middle East for Studies, said that the presence of Ibrahim Ghali in Spain in the name of Mohamed Bebtouche, an Algerian national, is something that cannot take place without negotiations between the Algerian regime and Spain, which has "historical secrets" about the regional multiplicity of the conflict.
Al-Ajlawi digs, in an opinion article received by the online newspaper Hespress, under the title: “The Sahara Conflict between Spain and Algeria”, in the complex relations between Spain and Algerian intelligence, and he asked: Did the type of relations between Algeria’s generals and the Spanish military security services reach the level of “super affection” between The two sides?
In his article, Al-Ajlawi talks about historical reasons that took place in the summer of 1975 when the preparation for a Spanish-Algerian plan to declare the independence of the Sahara began in the face of the "Polisario" with the sharing of military and economic benefits between Spain and Algeria.
This is the text of the article:
The forged "president" and the fictitious man
The presence of the "Polisario" leader in Spain raised an official debate between Morocco and Spain, and a discussion on social media about the priorities in this case, between the moral lawsuits against Ibrahim Ghali and the political depth of Spain's choice of this mother, and the protection of "humanitarian reasons", despite these The reasons did not appear until after the matter was revealed by the media. The presence of Brahim Ghali in Spain in the name of Mohamed Bebtouche, an Algerian national, is something that cannot take place without negotiations between the Algerian regime and Spain, which has "historical secrets" about the regional pluralism of the conflict. The new façade of the Algerian regime and the leadership of the "Polisario" and whoever wins them will be exposed to devils and minds, after the public exposure of the story of Ibrahim Ghali, the "president" who entered Spain under a false name; However, the riddle question is who divulged the "fake man" secret?
And if the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs insisted on the purely human dimension to welcome Ibrahim Ghali, and on the good relations existing between Morocco and Spain; Because it is aware that introducing new numbers to the regional conflict changes the reference for the solution, which Morocco affirms on the exclusivity of the United Nations in finding a solution to it, and that the new numbers serve the agendas of the new facade of the Algerian regime that has been moving since December 2020, at the extraordinary summit of the African Union, and in the last meeting The Peace and Security Council is in the custody of the presidency of the Algerian Ismail Al-Sharqi, and it is working to change the reference to the Sahara conflict, whose features have been well clarified since 2018.
The official Moroccan position on this issue carries two main dimensions: The first of them is legal and judicial, as international and Spanish human rights organizations must act, even in form, and the matter is an embarrassment to these organizations, especially the Spanish, which give lessons day and night in the necessity of respecting human rights and human dignity. The second two dimensions are political and strategic, related to the Spanish position on the Sahara conflict, and to push it towards victory for a political solution. Morocco will never accept Spain's return to the Sahara conflict due to humanitarian reasons and in relation to the new facade of the Algerian regime.
Spain, Algeria and cocaine steamer
Spain has become an actor in Algerian internal affairs since the summer of 2018. Its intelligence interests revealed to the Algerian army leadership a shipload carrying 701 kilograms of cocaine, prior to its arrival at the port of Oran, in which Kamal El Sheikhi (Al-Boushi) was involved, and a group of leaders of the security services and sons of political figures, including the son of the current Algerian president, and the security chief at the time, General Hamel. And the timing of informing the army command gave preference to the Algerian navy to investigate the matter of the ship, which sparked a war between Gaid Salah and Al-Hamel, which ended with the dismissal of General Hamel. This sin was the basis for the “president’s group”, of which Hamel was one of its pillars. The Algerian issue, and the rest we know is about arrests and dismissals. However, the strange thing is that a number of Algerian generals fled to Spain after the summer of 2018 and settled there. This is a golden opportunity for Spanish intelligence to supply all the "secrets" of the Algerian state that these generals carry, in exchange for protection.
Did these security files constitute a door for Spain to enter the vault of deep Algerian power? Is there a desire for Spain to play a role in North Africa, given the decline of French influence in the region? Did the type of relations between Algeria's generals and the Spanish military security services reach the level of "super affection" between the two sides? Is the rush to the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs to issue a communication on the matter a scenario that would have existed in the event of the discovery of the "fake president"?
The secret treaty between Spain and Algeria 1975
It is a deception of history that a rapprochement occurred between the Boumediene regime and the Franco government, in the summer of 1975, when Spain aimed at Franco at that time to realize its project aimed at creating a new entity in alliance with the Algerian regime, which was aiming to achieve the same goal, as revealed by the mission report The United Nations visited the region in May / June 1975, which highlights the change in the Spanish position between the mission's visit to Madrid on May 8-20, 1975.
The mission report conveyed that Spain does not want to put itself in the position of a judge, and the Prime Minister warned his desire that: “The countries and parties related to the case know that Spain is ready to immediately return the territory to an authority agreed upon by all in a fair and equitable manner…”. And that there is a danger of annexing the region against his will, and the Spanish official opens the door here towards reconciliation with the movements calling for the independence of the Sahara, especially the Polisario Front and the Sahrawi Patriotic Union.
The central idea of the Spanish proposal is the greed of neighbors, and that it favors the independence of the region. In parallel, the paragraphs from paragraph 40 to 60 within the mission's report cover the Algerian state's position on the issue of decolonization in the Sahara, and the steps that follow. In paragraph 46 of the report, the Algerian president reveals the intentions of his government to implement self-determination leading to the independence of the Sahara under the cover of the principle of the right to self-determination, and it is clear from the paragraphs of this report the rapprochement between the Boumediene regime and the Franco government. In Paragraph 48, Boumediene declares the following: “It is true that Algeria is assisting the Popular Front as it is prepared to assist all liberation movements without exception, including the Sahrawi National Union, the Liberation Front, and Unity ...”. All that has been said by the Algerian president confirms that independence is the only solution to the Sahara conflict.
In the summer of 1975, the preparation of a Spanish-Algerian plan to declare the independence of the Sahara began in the face of the "Polisario", with the sharing of military and economic benefits between Spain and Algeria. On October 14, 1975, Al-Muharr newspaper published “Document”, a letter from Sahrawis within the “Polisario” (L'Agouira group), to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. The letter reveals the content of the treaty signed between Algeria and Spain.
Spain is aware of all this, and its immediate and strategic interests push it to deal cautiously with Morocco in the Sahara conflict, knowing that a major shift occurred in the Spanish position in 2013, after the kidnapping of its citizens, and the emergence of a jihadist leadership from the Tindouf camps at the head of the unification and jihad movement. Among them is Abu Walid al-Sahrawi, who was a member of the leadership of the “Polisario” youth under the name of Sidi Lahbib Al-Idrisi, Ould Sidi Abdi Ould Sidi Said Ould Sidi Bashir Ould Al-Mahjoub, who currently heads the “Islamic State in the Greater Sahara” organization.
What happened recently between Spain and Algeria are wrong messages about the reference point for the conflict as drawn by the Security Council, and this is the strategic political depth of the "polite" protest from Morocco.
Translated from hespress.com
0 Comments